Buttocks In Shape Surgery Results (before and after)

Ear correction surgery or otoplasty results are great for both patients and surgeons. It improves the ear's shape, position, or proportion and creates a more natural form while bringing balance and dimension to the ears and face. The social implications of ear deformities for the developing child are well documented. Protruding ears are a frequent source of ridicule by peers and may contribute to various developmental abnormalities, including social phobias and outright behavioral disturbances. Correction of even minor deformities can have profound benefits to appearance and self-esteem. The ear development is virtually completed by the age of five, when I can undertake adequate measures. 

Nose job results are very satisfactory. I can achieve good results through surgery or rhinoplasty, or recently injectables. However, during nose surgery, even in patients with a first satisfactory outcome, slight asymmetries, depressions, and contour irregularities may present several years after surgery. Correcting these minor problems often requires surgical revision, and the available surgical options are limited in number, expensive, time-consuming, and prone to further complications. Non-surgical rhinoplasty, injectable rhinoplasty, or injectable nose job (filler, fat, or botox) has gained popularity for primary and revision nose enhancement procedures. In selected people, injection rhinoplasty can give a ready vise result in the convenience of the office setting. The process is minimally invasive and has an excellent safety record. It has been proposed for patients. However, unlike surgical rhinoplasty, it is limited in its ability to produce a significant change in the caudal aspects of the nose.

Fat transfer has become an increasingly important method of facial rejuvenation both as a standalone procedure and in combination with traditional rejuvenation methods, like face-lifting, brow lifting, and Blepharoplasty. A variety knows fat transfer names, of which the most commonly used are fat transfer, fat injection, and autologous fat grafts. The word autologous means material (fat) is harvested from one area and donated to another in the same individual. Fat transfer is particularly suited for restructuring the proportion of the face. Typical facial structures can also be aided by adding constructive elements to correct a broad range of perceived facial deficiencies. For example, a stronger jawline creates a youthful, more powerful-looking face; eliminating the hollowness of lower lids helps reduce that tired, sad appearance; and fuller lips create a more youthful, attractive appearance. Other indications include congenital, traumatic defects, or surgical defects and scars. Nano fat is applicable in a wide range of indications to improve skin quality; trophic skin changes caused by age and sun damage, pigmentary skin conditions, and scarring non-facial areas such as the neck, the décolleté area, and the hands can also greatly benefit from the use of nano fat grafting, sometimes in combination with micro fat.

Facelift filler injections results are very satisfactory for both patients and physicians. Facelift filler injection involve the use of two principal categories of temporary fillers approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for facial rejuvenation: hyaluronic acid and calcium hydroxyl apatite. The selection of HA implant is based on the indication and site of placement. For lifting and restoring volume and improving the structural foundations and facial contour, a high-density HA implant is injected deeply into the supra-periosteum. To treat medium-deep depression, we used a mid-density hyaluronic acid filler injected subdermal. For treating the periorbital area and the area around the lip, giving finished facial refinements, a low-density hyaluronic acid filler is selected with a water-like consistency filler. The most significant limitation of a filler is the cost. Each syringe can be expensive. The greatest benefit of a filler is accuracy. The other benefit is that a filler is bioinert and does not increase with a patient’s weight gain but obviously may not look good when a patient gains or loses weight as the filler has been injected to match a person’s current weight status.

Facelift Botox injection result is the most appreciated in cosmetic medicine. BOTOX dosing and injection points should be based on assessing the patient’s anatomy, goals, preferences, and the physician’s own professional experience with prior treatments. Gender, cultural, and ethnic standards of attractiveness may significantly influence the patient’s preference. Each patient’s treatment should be individualized for the best results. Cosmetic BOTOX in the mid and lower face and neck has increased drastically over the past few years. Indeed, there is now a greater appreciation that BOTOX-A is one part of overall facial rejuvenation therapy, in which all aspects of aging are addressed in the same individual. Finally, new esthetic indications emerge, including the treatment for scars, the horizontal upper lip line, musculus risorius excessive gingival display (‘‘gummy smile’’), and masseter reduction to improve facial shape. BOTOX is also beneficial with other aesthetic modalities, such as dermal fillers, laser, skin resurfacing, and surgery. Several more general applications push BTX-A toward an ‘‘art,’’ rather than a clinical procedure.

Mouth and lips or perioral region filler injection rejuvenation results depend on understanding of both perioral anatomy and perceived signs of aging to put the correct treatment plane. The patient and physician need to understand the types of defects that can be improved using noninvasive techniques and those that require a surgical approach. There are several aspects to be considered when rejuvenating the lips, such as redefining the vermillion border, replenishing lost volume, and degree of poutiness. Volume augmentation can be beneficial for treating aging lips, marionette lines, deep nasolabial folds, aging chin, elevation mouth corner, pre-jowl sulcus, and jawline augmentation. It is also an excellent choice for correcting static wrinkles that it cannot treat with BoNT alone and re-contour.

Mouth and lips or perioral region fat injection rejuvenation results depend on understanding perioral anatomy and perceived signs of aging. The principal areas of the lower face that benefit from fat augmentation are the pre-jowl sulcus, labio-mandibular recess, labio-mental sulcus, lateral jawline, and anterior central mentum. The perioral region is amended for improvement with millifat, microfat, and nanofat. Besides, pyriform augmentation with millifat will affect the lifting of the upper lip. Buccal atrophy is consistently seen in the fourth decade of life and beyond, as is buccal hollowing caused by previous overzealous excision of buccal fat or human immunodeficiency virus-associated facial wasting. Asymmetrical fat placement is often required on the right and left sides because of the frequent buccal asymmetry seen preoperatively in many patients. Fat transfer can correct age-associated loss of chin volume, loss of chin projection, and loss of vertical chin height, and in some cases, can rival the kind of improvements obtained when small chin implants are placed. Fat transfer of the chin can also correct an atrophic and feeble appearance. When indicated, the button shrinks with age by broadening and strengthening it and filling the labio-mental and submental creases. Fat transfer along the mandible can also correct an atrophic and feeble appearance as the mandibular border shrinks with age by broadening and strengthening it. Treatment of the jawline typically must be undertaken in conjunction with the pre-jowl groove, and the two areas overlap in most cases. However, patients seeking a quick recovery, a specific lip size or shape, or subtle changes are not optimal candidates for the procedure. Patients should also be advised that it is impossible to create the highly stylized cover-girl lip appearance seen in fashion magazines when using fat.

Mouth and lips or perioral region fat injection rejuvenation results depend on understanding both perioral anatomy and perceived sings of aging. Today's facial surgeons have more options to rejuvenate the mouth and lips in the perioral area. It is essential to have a thorough understanding of both perioral anatomy and perceived signs of aging to put the correct treatment plane. The patient and physician need to understand the types of defects that can be improved using noninvasive techniques and those that require a surgical approach. Many products and devices are available to physicians to address these issues and obtain favorable results from dark lips to perioral wrinkles. In general, changes in skin texture, tone, laxity, or pigmentation are treated with chemical peels, lasers, or energy-based solutions. Dermal fillers, Autologous fat, surgical lip implants, botulinum toxin A, and micro-pigmentation are all adjunctive therapies that may be used to augment or rejuvenate the lips. It can modify Orbicularis oculi muscle function via botulinum toxin (BTX) injections or surgery.

Fat Injection results in satisfactory rejuvenation around the eyes or periorbital region with little recovering time. Fat transfer to the forehead is an excellent method to lift the eyebrows without raising the brow to an unnaturally high position. Micro-fat or nano fat grafting can fill the skeletonized upper lid sulcus. Fat injected into the lower eyelid region will shift the cheek up and build the convexity of the youthful eye. Lower-lid volume replacement is also helpful in treating dark circles under the eyes by reducing shadows and the appearance of blood vessels under the skin. Microfat Injection is also an excellent choice for correcting static wrinkles that it cannot treat with BoNT alone. In most patients, I must undertake the treatment of the infraorbital, cheek, and tear trough areas together. I must combine fat Injection with a skin-only eyelid lift to achieve desirable rejuvenation.

Around the eyes or periorbital region filler vs fat injections results in depend on understanding both perioral anatomy and perceived sign of aging. Volume augmentation can be beneficial for treating deep nasojugal lines (often referred to as "tear trough" defects), the elevation of the temporal brow, and even smoothing fine eyelid wrinkling. It is also an excellent choice for correcting static wrinkles that it cannot treat with BoNT alone and re-contour. Which filler substance is considered "best" or "preferred" for you depends on the doctor's technique, skill, experience, training, facial needs, and risk tolerance? It has nothing to do with headlines in the media; these are often a result of its marketing. While synthetic fillers can smooth out wrinkles and folds, they cannot restore fullness that is naturally lost as fat and bone diminish, and it is not for everyone. Some individuals are allergic to synthetic materials and may develop an allergic reaction. Nevertheless, its use stays limited compared to commercial fillers. It appears that surgically trained and oriented cosmetic practitioners are far more likely to use fat. In large numbers, less surgically dermatologists, non-surgically trained "cosmetic practitioners," and non-physician "extenders" such as physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and even simple registered nurses favor synthetic fillers over autologous permanent fat filling injections.